Manual Testing vs Automation Testing: How Enterprises Decide What to Automate
Manual testing vs automation testing: compare cost, coverage and ROI. See which tests to automate, which stays manual, and.
Read more
Our customer had developed an in-house Inventory Management System (IMS) that comprised of a complex and heavily customized code base on multiple technologies. They wanted to partner with a vendor to support their IMS, as they faced the following challenges:
Everforth Quinnox carried out a study phase to understand the application landscape, feature requirements and created a roadmap for feature additions. We ensured business as usual (BAU) while adding new features and increased the usability of the applications for the business users. Reverse engineered the code and created proper documentation of business processes, rules and sequences. Streamlined governance & reporting process.
Everforth Quinnox established a structured induction process for faster on-boarding & cross-training of resources and created a repository of operating procedures to ensure effective knowledge transfer. We also built an automated regression suite for improving development/ deployment cycle time and have daily or weekly release.
Everforth Quinnox transitioned and stabilized the Inventory Management System in less than 12 weeks. We also ensure the following:
Manual testing vs automation testing: compare cost, coverage and ROI. See which tests to automate, which stays manual, and.
Read moreDiscover why context is becoming the deciding factor in build vs. buy for AI, and how enterprises can build.
Read moreWhere does your organization stand in Business Intelligence maturity? Explore Gartner’s five-level framework and strategies to advance toward AI-driven.
Read more